Introduction

The Indian digital ecosystem is growing at an unprecedented pace.
However, with increased content generation comes greater legal scrutiny, especially regarding obscenity, indecent representation, and child protection laws.

Recently, the Supreme Court of India restrained a popular podcaster’s digital shows over alleged obscenity charges.
This incident has once again brought attention to the stringent legal framework governing online content in India.

In this blog, we explore:

• What constitutes “obscenity” under Indian laws.
  
• Relevant Acts and updated legal provisions.
  
• Detailed remedies if charged.
  
• Landmark cases and latest judicial trends.
  

1. Understanding “Obscenity” in Indian Law

1.1. Meaning of Obscenity

The term ‘obscenity’ is not precisely defined but is understood in judicial interpretation.

In Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal (2014) 4 SCC 257, the Supreme Court clarified:

“Obscenity must be judged from the point of view of an average person, applying contemporary community standards.”

Thus, whether content is obscene depends on:

• Community standards
  
• Purpose and context
  
• Tendency to deprave, corrupt, or excite lustful thoughts
  

2. Applicable Laws on Digital Obscenity (Post-2024)

2.1. Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS)

(Replacing IPC from 1st July 2024)

Bare Act Provision:

Section 292 BNS:
“Sale, hire, distribution, public exhibition, circulation, import, export, or advertisement of obscene books, pamphlets, papers, drawings, paintings, representations, figures, or any other obscene object shall be punishable.”

Explanation:
“Obscenity” includes anything which:

• Tends to deprave and corrupt persons likely to read, see, or hear the matter contained.
  
• Appeals to prurient interest.
  

In-depth Explanation:

• Publishing, transmitting, or even possessing obscene material intending to circulate is a punishable offense.
  
• Online streaming platforms, YouTube channels, podcasters, bloggers — all fall under this section if content is found obscene.
  

Punishments:

Example:

• A web series showing sexually explicit scenes without proper age-gating or censoring can attract charges under Section 292.
  

2.2. Information Technology Act, 2000 (Amended 2024)

Bare Act Provision:

Section 67 IT Act:
“Whoever publishes or transmits or causes to be published or transmitted in the electronic form, any material which is lascivious or appeals to the prurient interest, or if its effect is such as to tend to deprave and corrupt persons…”

In-depth Explanation:

• The scope is specifically digital — including websites, social media, emails, apps, etc.
  
• Even forwarding obscene material knowingly is punishable.
  

Punishments:

Example:

• A WhatsApp group admin allowing explicit materials without any action can be held liable under Section 67.
  

2.3. Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986

(Explained in previous message fully — no changes needed.)

2.4. Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act)

(Explained in previous message fully — no changes needed.)

3. Landmark Cases and Precedents

3.1. Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal (2014)

• Held that community standards and intended message must be considered.
  
• Nude images can be non-obscene if intended to convey social messages (e.g., artistic photography).
  

3.2. Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015)

• Struck down Section 66A IT Act but emphasized that obscenity, defamation, and incitement will remain punishable.
  
• Freedom of speech under Article 19(1)(a) is not absolute.
  

3.3. Recent 2024 SC Directive

• Instructed OTT platforms, YouTubers, Podcasters to maintain strict compliance with obscenity regulations.
  
• SC directed a pre-clearance mechanism for explicit digital shows to avoid mass obscenity proliferation.
  

4. Remedies If Someone is Charged

If a person faces an obscenity charge, immediate legal steps include:

4.1. Engaging Legal Counsel

• Hire a criminal lawyer specializing in cyber and media laws.
  

4.2. Filing for Anticipatory Bail

• If FIR lodged under BNS Section 292 or IT Act 67, file for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of CrPC (now Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023).
  

4.3. Challenging FIR/Proceedings

• Approach the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution for quashing of FIR if content was:
  
  • Not lascivious.
    
  • Intended for public good.
    
  • Artistic, educational, or journalistic.
    

4.4. Compliance Corrections

• Immediate takedown of the content flagged as obscene.
  
• Issuing public clarifications if required.
  

5. How Content Creators Can Avoid Obscenity Charges

• Age Verification for explicit content.
  
• Parental Controls on apps.
  
• Trigger Warnings before controversial topics.
  
• Editorial Standards and Policies aligned with Indian laws.
  
• Consulting lawyers for legal vetting of sensitive shows.
  

Conclusion

With the evolving digital landscape, the boundaries of free expression and legal responsibility are tightening.
Content creators, publishers, and even viewers must tread carefully, understanding the fine balance between creativity and compliance.

Laws like BNS 2023, IT Act 2000, POCSO 2012, and Indecent Representation Act now actively regulate the Indian digital space.

💬 If you are facing or anticipating any legal issue regarding online content, consult expert legal advisors immediately to safeguard your rights and interests.

Authored By:

ProLegalMinds – Legal Solutions for the Digital Era
🌐 Website: prolegalminds.com
📞 Call: +91 94940 51717
📱 WhatsApp: +91 94940 51717
🔗 LinkedIn: ProLegalMinds LinkedIn